The Cost of Protectionism: How Trump’s Metal Tariffs Will Hurt American Businesses.

Geopolitics Supply Chain run down

The Cost of Protectionism: How Trump’s Metal Tariffs Will Hurt American Businesses.

14th March, 2025

AMERICA

President Donald Trump's 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports aims to protect domestic producers but threatens to harm American businesses by raising costs, disrupting supply chains, and provoking trade retaliation. Industries heavily reliant on these metals, such as automotive, construction, and consumer goods, are already experiencing cost increases. For example, the construction sector has seen steel prices rise by 8–15%, causing developers to delay or cancel projects due to higher expenses. Similarly, automakers like Ford face higher production costs, making U.S. vehicles less competitive globally. Beyond rising costs, the tariffs have strained relations with key trading partners, including Canada and the EU. In response, these countries have imposed retaliatory tariffs on American goods, further escalating trade tensions. The uncertainty surrounding these policies discourages business investment and expansion, reducing long-term economic growth. Furthermore, the tariffs create supply chain volatility, making it harder for companies to secure materials at predictable prices. Alcoa’s CEO warns that up to 100,000 aluminum-related jobs could be lost due to increased costs. While the tariffs aim to boost domestic metal production, they risk hurting more businesses than they help, ultimately leading to higher consumer prices, lost jobs, and weaker global competitiveness.

Canada Draws the Line: Imposes Tariffs on U.S. Metal Imports

Canada has imposed 25 percent tariffs on U.S. steel and aluminum imports worth approximately $20.8 billion. This move responds to the Trump administration’s global tariffs on these metals. The European Union (EU) also plans similar measures, targeting U.S. goods worth up to $28.4 billion, starting April 1. These actions escalate trade tensions and could disrupt global supply chains. The tariffs would increase costs for industries relying on these metals, such as the automotive and construction sectors. Higher material costs may lead to increased prices for consumers and reduced competitiveness for U.S. products abroad. Retaliatory measures from trade partners further strain relationships and create uncertainty in international markets. This uncertainty can deter investment and slow economic growth. The global supply chain faces potential disruptions as companies adjust sourcing strategies to mitigate tariff impacts. Shifts in suppliers may lead to inefficiencies and increased operational costs. Small and medium-sized enterprises, lacking resources to absorb these costs, could be particularly affected. Moreso, the escalating trade tensions risk hindering the interconnectedness of global markets, affecting production timelines and delivery schedules worldwide.

Latin America’s Trade Takes a New Turn Amid Sweeping Reforms.

Latin America and the Caribbean saw major changes in trade last year. Argentina’s exports grew by 18.1% due to President Javier Milei’s economic reforms. His policies include deregulation, subsidy cuts, privatization, and relaxed labor laws. Guyana led the region with a 59.6 percent export surge, driven by rising oil production. This marked its fifth consecutive year of double-digit growth. Peru’s exports rose by 15.8 percent as demand for its minerals increased. The country also expanded trade with the US and the EU. Venezuela’s oil recovery boosted its exports by 18.7 percent. Not all countries benefited. Nicaragua’s exports fell by 73.3 percent due to US sanctions linked to human rights concerns. Countries with tense US relations, like Suriname and Bolivia, also saw trade declines. The US remained the region’s top trade partner. While demand for raw materials was lower than in 2022, trade rebounded from 2023 levels. The trends highlight the impact of economic policies, global demand, and geopolitical ties on Latin American trade.

Congo Puts the Brakes on Cobalt Exports as Prices Hit New Highs

The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the world’s largest cobalt producer, suspended cobalt exports for four months starting February 22, 2025, to address global oversupply. This move caused cobalt hydroxide prices to soar by 84 percent. The DRC produces about three-quarters of the world’s cobalt, essential for electric vehicle (EV) batteries. FT.COM This export ban has significant implications for the global supply chain. Manufacturers relying on cobalt, especially in the EV sector, face increased material costs, potentially leading to higher prices for consumers or reduced profit margins. Companies may seek alternative sources or accelerate the development of cobalt-free technologies, impacting mining-dependent economies. The suspension also highlights the vulnerability of global supply chains to policy changes in resource-rich countries, emphasizing the need for diversified sourcing and strategic reserves. The DRC’s action may prompt other nations to reassess their mineral export strategies, influencing global commodity markets and trade dynamics.

Stronger Together: Vietnam Expands Trade Partnership with Singapore

Vietnam and Singapore have upgraded their relationship to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. This move aims to deepen economic cooperation, especially as Vietnam faces US scrutiny over its trade surplus. Vietnamese leader To Lam and Singapore’s Prime Minister Lawrence Wong announced the partnership, citing deeper cooperation in trade, investment, and development. Bilateral trade reached $9 billion last year, while Singapore’s investment in Vietnam surpassed $80 billion. The Vietnam-Singapore Industrial Parks (VSIPs), with 20 locations across 14 provinces, serve as key economic links. Vietnam seeks stronger regional ties to counter external trade risks. The US may impose tariffs due to Vietnam’s growing surplus, while the EU is pressuring Hanoi over sustainability commitments. Expanding economic partnerships within ASEAN could help Vietnam navigate these challenges. This shift will impact global supply chains. Strengthening ties with Singapore enhances Vietnam’s role as a manufacturing hub, attracting more foreign investment. It may also reduce reliance on Western markets, diversifying trade routes. However, failure to address US and EU concerns could lead to restrictions, disrupting Vietnam’s exports. The success of these partnerships will shape ASEAN’s economic balance and its role in global trade.

Japan’s Rice Export Strategy: Aiming Big for 2030

Japan aims to increase rice exports to 350,000 tons by 2030, an eightfold rise from 2024. The government plans to boost production while maintaining domestic supply. This effort is part of a broader agricultural strategy to enhance food self-sufficiency from 38 percent in 2022 to 45 percent by 2030. The policy focuses on increasing productivity and expanding exports amid geopolitical risks and a declining farming population. Japan also targets agricultural and food export growth from 1.5 trillion yen in 2024 to 5 trillion yen in 2030. Additionally, food-related spending by tourists is expected to rise from 1.6 trillion yen to 4.5 trillion yen. For competitiveness, Japan will encourage large-scale farming and cut production costs. Domestic rice consumption stands at 6.6 million tons annually, making the export goal roughly half a month’s supply. With a shrinking population, domestic demand will fall, making exports crucial. This strategy impacts global supply chains by increasing high-quality rice availability. It could pressure lower-cost producers in Asia while securing Japan’s agricultural stability. Trade partners may benefit from a more diversified rice market, but pricing competition will intensify. Japan’s focus on efficiency and export growth signals a shift in its agricultural priorities.

China Rejects US Criticism on Fentanyl, Calls Out ‘Unfair’ Tariffs

China claims it has taken strong measures to curb fentanyl trafficking and insists the US should acknowledge its efforts. At a press briefing, Chinese officials stressed their commitment to controlling the drug trade but condemned Trump’s tariffs, linking economic tensions to diplomatic roadblocks. The fentanyl crisis remains a key issue in US-China relations. Washington accuses Beijing of not doing enough to stop illegal fentanyl exports fueling America’s opioid epidemic. Beijing, in turn, argues it has fulfilled its responsibilities and rejects blame for US domestic drug issues. Trade tensions further complicate diplomacy. Trump’s tariffs on Chinese goods have strained economic ties, making cooperation on fentanyl enforcement harder. Beijing sees tariffs as unjustified and demands fair negotiations before broader discussions can proceed. China’s stance signals a desire for renewed talks but on its own terms. The US, however, remains skeptical of Beijing’s enforcement claims. Without mutual trust, progress on both trade and drug policy remains uncertain. This exchange buttresses how intertwined economic and security issues are in US-China relations. Without compromise, both sides risk deepening tensions, affecting global trade stability and international cooperation on crime control.

China to Host Iran Nuclear Talks Amid U.S. Pressure

China will hold nuclear talks with Iran and Russia in Beijing, just days after Trump warned Tehran to negotiate or face military action. Deputy foreign ministers from all three nations will be attending the talks. This move signals China’s intent to play a central role in global diplomacy, especially as US-Iran tensions escalate. Iran, under heavy US sanctions, seeks allies to counter American pressure. Russia, already at odds with the West, aligns with Beijing and Tehran to challenge US influence. Trump’s approach risks pushing Iran further toward China and Russia, strengthening an anti-Western bloc. The US may struggle to maintain leverage if these talks lead to stronger economic or security ties between the three nations. The talks could also impact global trade. US sanctions have already disrupted oil markets, and further escalation might drive energy prices higher. If China and Russia offer Iran alternative trade routes, US efforts to isolate Tehran could weaken. This development reflects shifting global alliances. As the US exerts maximum pressure, China positions itself as a diplomatic mediator, reshaping power dynamics in the Middle East and beyond.

China Expands Influence in the Indian Ocean, Rivaling US and India

China’s growing influence in the Indian Ocean is becoming a major point of tension, particularly with India and the US. Key islands like Mauritius are strategically important, as they provide access to crucial shipping lanes and military positioning. All three powers, China, the US, and India are competing to secure these bases to extend their reach in the region. China’s actions in the area are causing concern, especially given its efforts to build a broader maritime presence through infrastructure investments and potential military alliances. For the US and India, this growing Chinese footprint is viewed as a threat to regional stability and security. The competition for influence in the Indian Ocean has broader implications for global trade and security. Shipping lanes in this region are vital for the movement of goods between Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. Control over these strategic choke points can significantly affect the power dynamics and economic interests of global players. As China seeks to establish its dominance, it forces India and the US to adjust their military and economic strategies. The region’s stability hinges on these complex power struggles.

UK Keeps Cool, Refrains from Immediate Response to US Tariffs

The UK has chosen not to immediately retaliate against Trump’s 25 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum, diverging from the EU’s swift response. Prime Minister Keir Starmer expressed disappointment but emphasized ongoing US trade talks. Treasury officials stated that while the UK reserves the right to act, immediate retaliation is off the table. This decision reflects Britain’s post-Brexit strategy of prioritizing a trade deal with the US over alignment with EU policies. By holding back, the UK signals a willingness to negotiate rather than escalate tensions. However, this approach risks economic and political backlash if industries suffer from the tariffs while the EU moves ahead with countermeasures. The impact on supply chains could be significant. UK metal exporters face higher costs when selling to the US, while American buyers may seek alternative suppliers. If the UK does not secure exemptions or compensation, domestic industries could lose competitiveness. This move also tests Britain’s global trade identity. By breaking with the EU, the UK asserts independence, but it must carefully balance diplomacy with economic interests to avoid long-term damage.

Norway Pushes EU Laws for Tariff Exemption

Norway is lobbying the European Union to shield it from retaliatory tariffs sparked by Trump’s trade war. The US imposed levies on metals, prompting the EU to consider broad protective measures. Norway, though not an EU member, seeks an exemption by aligning more closely with EU regulations. Norway’s economy relies heavily on metal exports, making US tariffs a direct threat. To secure EU support, it is accelerating efforts to adopt EU trade policies. This move strengthens its economic ties with Europe and positions it as a key player in regional trade decisions. The stakes are high. If Norway fails to gain an exemption, its industries could suffer from restricted market access and higher costs. Conversely, closer EU alignment might reduce Norway’s policy flexibility, limiting its ability to negotiate independent trade deals. This situation reflects a larger global shift. Smaller economies must navigate the fallout of trade wars between major powers. Norway’s approach highlights how nations seek stability by reinforcing regional alliances, even at the cost of some sovereignty. As trade tensions persist, more countries may adopt similar strategies to protect their economies.

EU Hits Back at US Tariffs With €26 Billion Retaliation

The European Union (EU) has responded to US metal tariffs by imposing duties on up to $28.3 billion worth of American goods. This move follows President Donald Trump’s decision to slap tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, triggering a fresh wave of trade tensions. The EU’s countermeasures aim to pressure Washington into reconsidering its trade policies. Affected US exports include industrial goods, agricultural products, and consumer items. European leaders argue that these tariffs disrupt global trade and harm industries on both sides of the Atlantic. The retaliation adds strain to transatlantic relations, with fears of escalating protectionism. Businesses reliant on transatlantic trade face rising costs, supply chain disruptions, and market uncertainty. Sectors like automotive manufacturing, machinery, and agriculture are expected to suffer the most. This latest trade clash is a testament to risks of retaliatory economic policies. As tariffs pile up, companies and consumers in both regions will bear the financial burden. The EU’s move signals its willingness to stand firm against US trade aggression while seeking diplomatic solutions to ease tensions. The global economy now watches for Washington’s next response.

Get our stories delivered From us to your inbox weekly.

Get timely updates, insights and data from Adebayo on everything supply chain, security, trade and geopolitics.